Zunitara, Vivi (2017) Increasing Speaking Ability By Using Information Gap Technique Among The Tenth Graders Of The SMK N 1 Pekalongan East Lampung1804020005. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Metro.

Preview

PDF AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS VIVI ZUNITARA 13108717 TBI.docx.pdf - Other Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

This research is aimed to know the use of Information Gap Technique can increase the students’ speaking ability and to discuss how Information Gap Technique increase the students’ speaking ability at the tenth graders of the SMKN 1 Pekalongan East Lampung. This research is based on the last observation result that the learning process and students’ speaking score have been active by using Information Gap Technique.

The problem that faced by the students is the students have difficulties to express idea in speaking and they afraid of making mistakes when they speak english. This reearch is carried out to solve the students’ problem in speaking.

This research is Classroom Action Research (CAR). The CAR design used in this research is Jean Mc Kniff and Jack Whitehead that consists of four procedure: planning, acting, observing and reflecting. This research is conducted in 2 cycles and every cycle consists of 2 meetings. The subject of the research were 30 students of tenth graders on accountancy B of the SMKN 1 Pekalongan East Lampung. The data of the research were collected through the observation, documentation, and tests.

Based on the result of this reseach, it can be said that the use of Informtion Gap Technique to increase speaking ability is success, becausethe criteria of success was achieved. The research will be called success if there is 70% or more of the students who passed the standard minimum criteria 70 and there is increasing in learning activity. The result shows that in the pre test 2, there is 73,30% of students who passed the standartd minimum criteria. Before the action was conducted, there is just 16,70% of the students who passed the minimum criteria. The data showed that the students’ average in the pre test was 54,3 in the post test 1 was 63,8 and in the post test 2 was 71. It means that there was increasing on students’ score from the pre test to cycle 1 and cycle 2. Besides, the increasing can be seen from the students learning process. They seem more active during the teching learning process

Actions (login required)

View Item