Setiawan, Wahyu and Siradjuddin, Azmi and Liberty, Liberty (2019) Telaah ulang wacana haid dan istihadah pada akseptor keluarga berencana. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 19 (1). pp. 103-123.

PDF Artikel di Jurnal Ijtihad (Sinta 2).pdf - Other Download (547kB)

Abstract

The legal inference of vaginal blood in Islam generally adopts the paradigm called haid-cum-istihadah. The paradigm starts with the identification of menstrual blood by looking at minimum limit, maximum limit, or by blood characters. When the blood fails the requirements established by mazhab fiqh, it turns to the so-termed istihadah. The paradigm tends to be confusing when confronted with menstrual irregularities that happened on hormonal acceptors. The vaginal blood could not be categorized as menstrual by medical or fiqh literatures. This article offers an alternative paradigm called istihadah cum- > haid wich is built upon three building blocks namely: turāth interpretation, medical considerations, and empirical experiences of hormonal acceptors. These three building blocks were underpinned by Loay Safi’s thought called Unified Approach to Textual and Contextual Analysis. The data of this research were collected through studies on comparative fiqh literatures and interviews with 70 acceptors, 1 obstetrician-gynecologist, 5 midwifes, and 4 academicians in the field of medication. This alternative paradigm urges that vaginal blood acceptors treated istihadah. Next to istihadah identification, is the establishment of menstruation days for acceptors based on fiqh mazhab related to mustahadaah rules.

Actions (login required)

View Item